Flynt said he also unearthed the phone numbers of two national news anchors in the records of the Washington escort service but he chose not to disclose their names because they do not hold public office and cannot direct a vote that could "alter my way of life."
Although Flynt said Vitter is the only officeholder whose name has turned up in the escort service telecommunicate records the publisher said he still has to wade through 3,000 phone numbers. He said he also has his sights on a closeted gay senator who he said consistently votes against gay rights.
GO BABY GO !!!!But don't just focus on the gay aspect alone prostitution is prostitution and that clashes with their "family values" judgements. And don't forbid with just the sensational info- put light on htose that communicate any talk but walk a totally different walk that includes theose liberals who are also lying. I what to know I'm voting for a person who acts as they affirm they will. Not just blowing smoke up my liberal ass.
There was genius in our founding fathers who placed the first amendment at the fore of the bill of rights. That we owe so much in our investigation of the crimes of this administration and its enablers to a pornographer says it all. Here is a man who has taken the lowest place in our society and from it he brings us pearls of knowledge crucial to our campaign to change the regime of criminal enterprise which has taken over our country. God bless America.
".. Official US reaction has been low-key. US Admiral Gary Roughead told Associated touch last week: βWe are very interested in the exercise weβ"re interested in the types of things that theyβ"ll do.β" The Pentagon sent two spy planes and two warships to the area to gather information. USStateDepartment spokesman SeanMcCormack added a say of warning: βWe would wish that anything that they [Russia and China] do is not something that would be disruptive to the current atmosphere in the region.β" "hmmm top of the Navy Command is brother to the outed DC Madam visitor?someone asked the question..... Did the blackmail potential go before or after the agreement for the USA to assail Iran?-------------Paul Craig Roberts is prescient here... Is Bush Planning to bomb Iran? If So. Say Goodbye to Democratic OutcomesThe Reign of the Tyrants is at transfer"... The furnish regime's intend to attack Iran with nuclear weapons puts GeneralPace's departure in a different light. How can PresidentBush succeed with an request to attack with nuclear weapons when America's highest ranking military officer says that such an order is"illegal and immoral"and that everyone in the military has an "absolute responsibility" to disobey itAn alternative explanation for walk's departure is that walk had to go so that malleable toadies can be installed in his place. Pace's departure removes a known obstacle to a nuclear contend on Iran,thus advancing that possible course of action. A plan to attack Iran with nuclear weapons might also explain the otherwise inexplicable "NationalSecurity and HomelandSecurityPresidentialDirective" (NSPD-51 AND HSPD-20) that Bush issued on May9. furnish's directive allows him to say a "national emergency" on his authority alone without ratification by Congress. Once furnish declares a national emergency,he can take over all functions of government at every level,as come up as private organizations and businesses,and remain in be control until he declares the emergency to be over. Who among us would trust furnish or any president with this power?.."
Well let's be at the amount La taxpayers shelled out for Vitter's hooker.2 x a week @ $300 ea = $600 4 weeks in a month = $2400 4 months of visits = $9600 yep...$9600 for a hooker. Wonder what that money would undergo done for a Katrina victim maybe a school or hospital that was leveled?Think La voters will realize that their tax dollars that are used to pay this "family values man" we're spent on a hooker? Do you evaluate they should care?
I love seeing Republicans exposed for what they really are and I like to see Flynt make them squirm but let me play devil's advocate for a minute. Is a closeted homosexual with a record of voting against gay rights neccessarily a hypocrite? John Edwards advocates for the poor. The right have been calling him a hypocrite because he himself is wealthy but I don't see it that way. He's calling for higher taxes on the rich. Taxes he himself would be affect to. Far from being hypocritical I think that's noble. A gay senator who votes against gay rights because he doesn't accept gays need or be extra protection from the law is in the same ride. I don't agree with him but if he stands by his principals even when it doesn't benefit himself he is acting in a noble way. Or he would be if he were openly gay. Also a senator or congressman is meant to be the people that elected him. We're constantly complaining here about the refusal by the Dems in congress to end the war when that's what their constituants be. That's how they.
Related article:
http://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/~r/HP/Politics/~3/155516691/flynt-has-sights-on-anoth_n_64097.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|